The Obama Foundation, the nonprofit behind the more than $800 million Obama Presidential Center, has drawn scrutiny following disclosures that its CEO, Valerie Jarrett, earned $755,862 in salary and other compensation in 2024, with sixteen other officers or key employees also receiving six-figure compensation. According to the charity’s 2024 IRS tax Form 990 (Parts VII, VIII, & Schedule J), the foundation’s total salaries and benefits rose to more than $40 million in 2024 as the organization expanded to hundreds of employees and nearly $210 million in annual revenue.
The compensation levels stand out not only for their size, but also for the concentration of leadership among individuals with close ties to the Obama administration. A review of filings by Fox News found that a majority of the foundation’s highest-paid executives previously served in senior roles connected to former President Barack Obama, raising questions about governance, independence, and hiring practices within a politically connected nonprofit.
CharityWatch CEO Laurie Styron emphasized that such dynamics can heighten the need for transparency and accountability. As she noted in her interview with Fox News:
“Any time you are dealing with a nonprofit that is politically connected in some way, there is always a heightened risk of nepotism creeping in.”
Styron added:
“If multiple highly paid executives have ties to the former president’s administration, the public deserves significant transparency about how those hiring and compensation decisions were made.”
These concerns are particularly relevant as the foundation prepares to operate a large, high-profile campus on public land under a long-term agreement with the City of Chicago, further elevating the importance of public trust and governance standards.
High nonprofit salaries often attract public attention, but compensation alone does not determine whether a charity is operating effectively or responsibly. A nonprofit executive’s compensation should be based on the education, skills, and experience needed to do the job competently. Nonprofits compete with the for-profit sector for qualified leadership, so underpaying can create operational risks just as overpaying can undermine donor confidence.
Determining an appropriate market rate should take into account multiple factors, including the cost of living in the organization’s geographic region, the complexity of its operations, and the expertise required to manage its programs. High salaries are not inherently problematic, just as low salaries are not automatically a sign of efficiency.
In response to questions from Fox News about executive pay, a representative for the Obama Foundation stated that “Executive salaries are based on competitive market rates for roles of the same level in similar institutions nationwide,” and that “Overall, salaries throughout the foundation, across all levels, are discounted relative to those in the private sector.”
The organization also pointed to higher compensation levels at major philanthropic institutions with multibillion-dollar endowments as a basis for comparison, according to Fox News. However, those comparisons are not necessarily equivalent. Many of the cited institutions operate with substantial endowments that generate ongoing investment income that covers much of their operating costs, while the Obama Foundation’s financial structure is more heavily dependent on fundraising tied to the development and operation of its presidential center.
Ultimately, the issue is not simply how much executives are paid, but how compensation decisions are made and whether they reflect independent governance and sound stewardship. When leadership is drawn from a close-knit network with shared political or professional backgrounds, donors may reasonably expect greater transparency into how salaries are determined and whether appropriate safeguards are in place.
As the Obama Foundation moves closer to opening its presidential center this June, these questions are likely to remain central to evaluating its operations. For donors and the public alike, the key consideration is not just the scale of the organization’s ambitions, but whether its governance and compensation practices meet the standards expected of a major charitable institution.
Will you help CharityWatch continue our important work?
As the only independent charity watchdog organization in the United States, CharityWatch relies on your support to fund our in-depth research and analysis in order to bring you the unbiased charity ratings and other information you rely on to help you make more informed giving decisions. We are not directly or indirectly funded by nonprofit industry interests.
We hope you will consider making a donation today so that we can continue to speak openly and critically and call out wrongdoing when we see it without concern for special interests cutting our funding. CharityWatch is a small organization and your donations are noticed, needed, and greatly appreciated. Thank you for giving wisely!
